Baptism among the dead
Posted on March 12th, 2012
A discussion about baptism for the dead came up in the comments on this post. As I was preparing my response, I came across this interesting passage in Luther (AE 28), who also reads 1 Cor. 15:29 as a reference to baptisms happening “among the dead” (in cemeteries).
But Paul adds a phrase to the word “baptize,” pro mortuis. This has been interpreted to mean—and so it reads in Latin—that they had themselves baptized “for the dead,” that is, for the unbelievers in heathendom. Then they would have been baptized twice, once for themselves and the second time for members of their family. But that cannot be. For in Acts 2:38 Peter says: “Be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ, etc.” This does not mean that one should be baptized for another. It is the same as that everyone must repent, believe, and profess his faith for himself. Therefore I adhere to the meaning, in concurrence with the old Greek teachers, which we indicated in a marginal note next to this text, namely: In St. Paul’s day this article [of the resurrection of the body] was still novel and was just being spread. It was unknown and unheard of among the heathen, also among the most erudite in Greece, although they did advance to the point where they assumed that the soul lived after the death of the body, without being able to prove this conclusively. However, that man would rise again and that body and soul would be reunited, of that they knew nothing at all.
They had themselves baptized at the graves of the dead in token of their firm conviction that the dead who lay buried there and over whom they were being baptized would rise again.
In view of this, it was hard for them at first to believe the apostles’ proclamation; and those who believed it had to endure much ridicule. And so, in order to strengthen this article among the people, they had themselves baptized at the graves of the dead in token of their firm conviction that the dead who lay buried there and over whom they were being baptized would rise again. They were so convinced of this that they were, in a manner of speaking, pointing their finger at it. Similarly, we might administer Baptism publicly in a common cemetery or at a funeral. Therefore we read that the congregation at Aquileia had been taught and was accustomed to recite this article in the Creed thus: “I believe in the resurrection of this flesh.” This was undoubtedly done for the purpose of teaching and professing also this article clearly and correctly over against the factious spirits.
One of the most moving experiences of my life was a visit to the San Callisto catacombs outside of Rome. Kassie and I were vacationing there for our tenth anniversary, and we’d gotten on the wrong bus, dropping us off several miles from the catacombs. We were walking on the Via Appia Antica through serene, beautiful countryside, when the road suddenly became very narrow and connected to a major driving road. We were literally forced to walk sideways with our backs against a wall, cars racing by at very high speeds a foot or two away. I became convinced we would die then and there, but we finally made it, and finally entering into the peaceful gardens, we then partook of a deeply spiritual encounter with the artwork of those ancient Christians still present, nearly two millennia later, on the walls of their burial place, where they also worshipped. There they received the Eucharist and confessed the resurrection of JESUS and their own coming resurrection. I suspect there was a similar situation in Corinth, and there a practice emerged of baptizing among the dead.
Tagged: Baptism, Baptism by proxy, Baptism for the dead, Luther


Dear Pastor Esget… altho this wasn’t the personal reply I had expected to receive, be assured that it was well received. I respect your many years of preparation and education to be able to serve in the capacity you do. Since you have my grandchildren in your spiritual flock, I am grateful for the inspired love of our Savior that you have the opportunity to pass on to them.
As you are aware, I am just one member in a church of almost 15 million with no authority to speak for other than myself. For official statements on theological issues, I refer you to http://www.lds.org. I have, however, spent more than more than 7 decades in personal and prayerful scripture study, developing an ongoing faith in not only the truth of, but in the importance of seeking an understanding of both the Old and New Testament.
In cases, such as you cited of passages that are not repeated or easily understood, surely common logic, in context with other biblical passages/teachings, carries a bit of worth. If we must be baptized to enter into a covenant w/ Christ (Christ teaches this throughout his ministry but very plainly in John 3:3-5) then what about those that never had a chance to do exactly that? What is the theological answer to that? Are those souls just permanently and forever lost? Does God not love all his all his children equally and want them all to have the same opportunity for His gift of grace, redemption and resurrection?
Let’s consider other Biblical passages related to the concept of literal baptism for the dead. In 1 Peter 3-18 evidence is provided that the Gospel was preached to those who had died without a knowledge of Christ….and 1 Peter 3:18-21 (compare John 5: 25-29) says:
18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ….
And here is 1 Peter 4:6, which follows a reference in verse 5 to “him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead”: For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.”
Additionally, the idea of vicarious work for others is not a strange concept in the Gospel of Jesus Christ but is quite central to the New Testament. Christ’s Atonement is the ultimate example of a vicarious act, a sacrifice done on behalf of all of us. When Paul says baptism “for” or “on behalf of” the dead, he uses the same Greek construction that is used to describe Christ sacrifice “on our behalf.”
These scripture passages do indeed tell us that the Gospel was preached to those who had died including those who had lived long before the time of Christ (1 Peter 3:20.) This was done in the spirit world (spirit prison.) Now what sense is it to preach the Gospel to the dead if they cannot accept it? If they accept it, they will still need to fully enter into the covenant with Christ through baptism by immersion (see 1 Peter 3:21 shown above; Romans 6:1-7; Acts 2:37-38; Mark 16:16; John 3:3-5, etc.), but this sacred ordinance requires a living body. The revealed solution: the dead can accept baptism performed in their behalf (1 Cor. 15:29) – a vicarious act of service. This is part of the process that makes the judgment of God truly just, for an opportunity is provided even to those who are dead to hear and fully accept the Gospel of Christ, and thus “live according to God in the spirit.”
It would be very helpful and perhaps enlightening to watch this 3 minute video. It features a respected Lutheran theologian speaking on the subject of baptism for the dead (about the 1:15 min mark) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x_-TQivCx8.
In Christian theology we believe that baptism is necessary for salvation, but not absolutely necessary. This is how I answer the problem of those who have no opportunity for baptism. The early Christians had to wrestle with this matter quite particularly, given the problem of catechumens martyred before their baptism. The fathers spoke of this as a greater baptism still, the “baptism of blood.” St. Augustine said it best, I think: “It is not the lack of baptism that damns, but the despisal thereof.” This is of particular comfort to me in the case of little children who die before baptism, such as those stillborn or miscarried.