[Sermo Dei] Rogate: Praying with Jesus (John 16:23-33)

Posted on May 5th, 2013

“In the world you will have tribulation.” Hardly surprising information to anyone who has lived a little while in this broken, fallen world. Yet there is comfort in acknowledging it: “In the world you will have tribulation.” If Jesus says this to His holy Apostles, should we expect things for us to be smooth sailing, success and perfection?

In the world you will have tribulation – and thus we find tribulation, trouble and turmoil, everywhere we turn. And wherever the Gospel of Jesus is preached, there especially will be tribulation.

The longer we follow Jesus as a disciple, the closer we draw near to Him, the greater the tribulation in our own heart, in our own mind, in our own flesh, in our own soul. For we hear, “Be doers of the word, and not hearers only,” and we recognize our extraordinary capacity for self-deception. We accuse others of the sins we ourselves have committed. Our own actions we justify, the same actions of our neighbor we condemn.

Do you think you are religious? Why have you not bridled your tongue? Have you become impatient? Have you grumbled about what God has given you, and what He has withheld? Do you visit orphans and widows in their affliction? Do you keep yourself unstained from the world? Were St. James to address us directly on the topics of this morning’s epistle, would he not have every right to say, “Your religion is worthless”?


And so your prayers are worthless. For being a hearer of the word but no doer, what right do you have to pray? What right do you have to present any petition, any request to God Most High?

None. And this, my friends, you dear baptized children of God, is why we always pray in the name of Jesus. Not a formula or a magical incantation, praying in the name of Jesus is coming before God under the guise, under the disguise, behind the mask, and on the shoulders of the Son of God. He gives us His keys, He gives us His login, His username and password, so that we have access on account of His merit, His worthiness, His righteousness.

So in the Lord’s Prayer, we do not pray, “Forgive me my trespasses,” but Jesus teaches us to pray, “Forgive us our trespasses.” He prays the prayer first, and we after Him and along with Him. The words are His before they are ours.

Christ praying in Gethsemane

Jesus, you see, stepped into all our troubles, embraced our tribulation, and He stands before the Father as a Man, with all us men behind Him, and says to the Father on behalf of all humanity, “Forgive us our trespasses.” This is the most wonderful thing Jesus ever said: “Forgive us our trespasses.” Having nothing in Himself to be forgiven, He identifies with Adam our first father’s sin, with the sins of Noah and Abraham and Moses and David, with the sins of Peter and Paul, James and John, with the sins of Mary and Martha; when Jesus stepped into our human flesh, He already envisioned and identified with Elizabeth Rose, and said, “Father, forgive her; Our Father, forgive us our trespasses.”


This is why in the traditional liturgy, the pastor faces the altar for the prayers and the Words of Jesus in the Lord’s Supper. I am not turning my back on you, but rather you and I are all facing the same direction. When I face you, I am speaking God’s Word to you. But when I turn the other way, I am not facing away from you; rather, we all are standing before God and I as pastor speak for us all.

I am not Jesus. I am not your Savior. I am not more holy than you, more righteous than you, more pure than you. I stand as you before the altar, a broken sinner, and repeat the words of Jesus, “Forgive us our trespasses.” It has been my great delight to see Karen Maurer become a teacher in our school, marry a fine Christian man like Eric Gorr, and now this morning baptize their beautiful little girl. And as part of the rite, the pastor speaks directly into the ear of the one to be baptized the Our Father. It’s Baptism that makes us able to say that prayer, because it’s not our prayer but our Lord’s Prayer. The Words are His, and we just say them with Him. He stands before the Father for us, and we get to stand behind Him. He is nailed to the cross for us, He rises from the dead for us, He ascends into heaven for us, He will come again for us, He forever stands for us before the Father and says, “Forgive us our trespasses.”


And we have this guarantee from Jesus today: ”Whatever you ask the Father in My name, He will give you.” And so we ask for the hardest thing of all: “As we forgive those who trespass against us.” That too is a prayer. In our pride and foolishness, easily do we rage against our neighbor, finding fault and bringing down judgment. As difficult as it is to repent, just as difficult if not more is releasing someone from their sins against us.

So we stand at the font, we stand at the altar, we stand with Jesus and pray with Him, “Forgive us our trespasses, and help me forgive those against whom I hold grudges, for I do not want to forgive them, and the bitterness and pride is destroying my soul. So lead me not into the difficult test, but deliver me from the evil one.”

Praying this way is the only way your relationships can become godly. Praying this way is the only way we can have truly successful church council meetings or voters meetings. Praying this way is the only way we can build a Spirit-filled school. Praying this way is how we die.

So run now from that Sacrament to this one, and pray with Jesus, “Forgive us our trespasses.”

The Prophecies of Paul VI

Posted on April 22nd, 2013

A professor in seminary had me read Humanae Vitae, the 1968 papal encyclical on human birth and sexuality, the document most associated with the Roman Catholic stance on contraception. It’s something I ought to reread, having had more time to reflect on it. Mary Eberstadt (in Adam and Eve after the Pill) outlines the predictions of Paul VI on how the world would change if contraception became widely accepted:

The encyclical warned of four resulting trends: a general lowering of moral standards throughout society; a rise in infidelity; a lessening of respect for women by men; and the coercive use of reproductive technologies by governments.

It all has happened. Exhibits A & B: the “see no evil” approach to Gosnell’s “House of Horrors”; the trampling on religious freedom by the United States government in the name of providing “free” abortifacients and sterilization. But what is most astonishing to me is how the disconnection of procreation from sex has led to a culture incapable of discerning any difference between men and women, and thus the loss of marriage itself, that most foundational of all human institutions. All in half a century.

“Old Believer Orthodox” family found in Siberian wilderness after 40 years in hiding from atheist persecution

Posted on April 20th, 2013

This article from the Smithsonian is a few months old, and the story even older, but it is truly fascinating. A family of “Old Believers,” seeking to remain faithful to Russian Orthodoxy, went so far out in Siberia as to be unaware of World War II. They were found in 1978, living a medieval kind of life, cut off from all human contact.

The low door creaked, and the figure of a very old man emerged into the light of day, straight out of a fairy tale. Barefoot. Wearing a patched and repatched shirt made of sacking. He wore trousers of the same material, also in patches, and had an uncombed beard. His hair was disheveled. He looked frightened and was very attentive…. We had to say something, so I began: ‘Greetings, grandfather! We’ve come to visit!’

The old man did not reply immediately…. Finally, we heard a soft, uncertain voice: ‘Well, since you have traveled this far, you might as well come in.’

The Lykov family fled in 1936, two parents and two children. Two more children were born in the wild, and had never seen other humans before being found by geologists.

The Lykov children knew there were places called cities where humans lived crammed together in tall buildings. They had heard there were countries other than Russia. But such concepts were no more than abstractions to them. Their only reading matter was prayer books and an ancient family Bible. Akulina had used the gospels to teach her children to read and write, using sharpened birch sticks dipped into honeysuckle juice as pen and ink. When Agafia was shown a picture of a horse, she recognized it from her mother’s Bible stories. “Look, papa,” she exclaimed. “A steed!”

The 1950′s were “the hungry years,” where they nearly starved after losing their crop of carrots. It snowed in June in 1961, and the mother died of starvation, choosing to let her children eat her food. They ate shoes and bark. They noticed satellites in the sky but didn’t know what they were:

The Lykovs had noticed them as early as the 1950s, when “the stars began to go quickly across the sky,” and Karp himself conceived a theory to explain this: “People have thought something up and are sending out fires that are very like stars.”

The whole thing is really quite amazing. Read it here.

Get Clean

Posted on April 13th, 2013

I published this a few years ago, but the video is broken. Here’s a working one. If you haven’t been to confession lately, go. It’s a great blessing, all for the joy of forgiveness.

 

How do you use the Divine Service settings in Lutheran Service Book?

Posted on April 13th, 2013

Lutheran Service Book-Altar Book

A new pastor recently wrote to me asking for advice; his church leadership has asked him to use all the settings, instead of just one. He asked for my brief thoughts on the positives and drawbacks of each setting. Here’s what I wrote to him:

 


One could write an essay on this question! Let me tell you what I currently do, and why, then talk about your options.
  • Advent: Setting 2
  • Christmas & Epiphany: Setting 3
  • Pre-Lent (Gesimas): Setting 1
  • Lent: Setting 2
  • Holy Thursday: Setting 3
  • Good Friday: Chief Service
  • Easter Sunday and Quasimodo Geniti: Setting 3 with “This is the Feast” as post-communion canticle
  • Misericordias Domini through Trinity Sunday: Setting 3
  • Trinity 1-27: alternate between Settings 1 & 3 (about monthly)
  • Reformation Sunday: Setting 5
Thoughts on the settings:
  1. Pros: very singable; richer Eucharistic prayers; abbreviated Litany of St John Chrysostom as Kyrie is beneficial. Cons: Too many options; canticles contain paraphrases rather than good translations; response to salutation is wrong.
  2. Same as 1, but far less singable. You will notice that my scheme has settings 1 & 2 largely used in penitential seasons where the Gloria is dropped. This avoids the problematic “This is the feast” and the unsingable “Gloria” in setting 2
  3. Archaic language is a pro or con depending on the congregation. I think this is a big pro, lending stability and a tie to our past. This setting is the old Common Service in American Lutheran tradition, and should be kept alive. It is the setting the older life-long Lutherans learned in childhood. Other pros: Good translation, very singable. Cons: Barebones Eucharistic liturgy.
  4. Pros: fresh texts for confession of sins, Eucharistic prayers. Cons: terrible paraphrases; syrupy tunes that lack substance and don’t match well with the texts. If I had a congregation that had been doing “contemporary” worship, I’d start them on this. But it’s not for mature congregations.
  5. Pros: great teaching tool about the meaning and history of Lutheran liturgy. Cons: lots of page-flipping or printing; difficult to sing without practice/experience. Not for every-Sunday use.
I think a rotation is good to keep things fresh, but not so often that people can’t settle in and really learn a setting.
Depending on what they know, do a basic rotation that highlights the changes in the seasons of the church year. You are sending a message that Lent is different from Easter, for example.
Whatever you do, don’t make it different each and every Sunday!

 

And a little child shall lead them

Posted on April 11th, 2013

Remember this?

Baptism Request

It finally happened. After more than a year of this little boy earnestly desiring Baptism, he got his wish and was baptized this past Sunday. I am filled with joy at each and every baptism. This one, however, was among the most meaningful.

Sermo Dei: The Annunciation of Our Lord

Posted on April 10th, 2013

Delivered at the LCMS Evening Prayer service at the Lutheran Service Association conference in Washington, D.C., April 10. The theme of the conference was Service Speaks.

 


Dear Christian friends, your theme for this conference is Service Speaks. It’s a good one – so long as we get the order right. In the beginning, God speaks. He speaks creation into being: “Let there be light”; “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters”; “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together”; and on and on. God speaks. And the entire purpose of His speaking was love. God created the world from nothing in order to bestow His gifts, His love, His life upon the man. The entire world was given as gift to the man. God serves man, and man as steward loves and serves creation.

It began with a woman. Got brought forth a woman from the man, to be at his side, to be a partner with him in the ongoing work of creation, of service, of love.

God created the world from nothing in order to bestow His gifts, His love, His life upon the man.

They fell. Death entered the world. Not just as something bad that happens at the end of a life, but as a principle. Death now reigns, making us fearful, fearful of the tiniest bugs, fearful of each other, fearful of telling the good news of God and creation, Jesus and resurrection. And each day we die the death a thousand times, as aging eyes beget blurred vision, pollen brings allergies, bones become brittle and break, hands become nervous and shake.

Whether all these harbingers of death plaguing us moment by moment, or the horrific experiences of death suddenly breaking through in violence and war – death is everywhere. As Luther put it, “In the very midst of life, death has us surrounded.”


But nine months before the first Christmas, the Son of God took on human flesh, as an unwed mother experienced an unplanned pregnancy. Our Lord experienced life inside the womb, as a zygote, an embryo, a foetus.

Our Lord experienced life inside the womb, as a zygote, an embryo, a foetus.

Service Speaks. The angel Gabriel came to a young Jewish girl and speaking, upset everything. He upset all of her plans, all of her betrothed husband Joseph’s plans, all of Herod’s plans, and plans have been upset ever since. But the plans that were most upset were the plans of the devil, who first spoke to a woman, “God is lying, you will not surely die, but become as God.”

Service speaks, as God the Lord and Master of all becomes a servant, all by speaking. The angel spoke the Word, and by the Word the blessed virgin conceived. The King of the Universe became a servant in her womb.

annunciation

And how does Mary respond? Today she would be counseled to discard the child. There were people to whom Mary could have gone; the Bible and other early Christian literature calls them “potion-makers.” Drink this potion, and the ‘problem’ is solved.


But just as Christ the Lord came to serve, so now Mary, by this angel’s speaking, by God’s speaking is called to service, to serve the Son that God entrusted to her.

The King of the Universe became a servant in her womb.

Most of her life was spent laboring in obscurity: changing diapers, cooking supper, mending Joseph’s clothes battered from wood-working day after day. They run for their lives, and become immigrants in a strange land, a land where their ancestors were once slaves. Then back again when the coast is clear, then losing this Boy, this strange and wonderful Boy. All the while hearing the echo of that old man in the temple, saying that by this Boy a sword would pierce her heart. Then seeing a spear thrust into His belly as He hung naked and desolate, utterly humiliated – that spear thrust must have been as a sword to her own heart, this unplanned Child, this wonderful Boy, this dead Son, gone, humiliated, serving to the end.

This woman, this most blessed of all women teaches us what service means. It means first of all hearing the Word of God and simply saying “Amen.” For in that Word—and in the Word incarnate in her womb—is the service, the Divine Service, the Lord’s service to you, and me, and all humanity. “Amen,” “Yes, Lord, Your Word is true, Your service is my salvation.”


And then, the blessed Mary speaks as a servant: “Behold the maidservant of the Lord! Let it be to me according to your word.” These simple words are the perfect response to the Lord’s Word. She wasn’t planning on being a mother just yet, and certainly not in this way. It wouldn’t be easy to explain, and it would cause great trouble for her. But through this the Lord was working, through this the Lord was serving, and also calling her to service.

So this is what we say to the strange things, the odd people and difficult circumstances the Lord throws at us, upsetting all of our plans and priorities. Service speaks like Mary: “Behold the maidservant of the Lord!”, all as the beautiful response to the service our Lord renders to us, speaking the world into being, speaking forgiveness to us through Jesus, and then at the last, speaking to our graves as once He did to Lazarus: “Come forth!”

God bless you for such service. +INJ+

Why Christians should care about homosexual “marriage”

Posted on April 5th, 2013

George Neumayr at the American Spectator argues that there is a major consideration being overlooked in the homosexual “marriage” debate. Many Christians would like to retreat, under the supposition that it won’t affect them. In “Religious freedom’s Drip-by-Drip Death,” Neumayr contends this is wrong:

The end point of liberalism is a coercive secular state in which the religious have no meaningful rights. American church leaders are kidding themselves if they think the gay-marriage juggernaut is going to stop at civil marriage. It won’t. It will quickly travel past court houses to churches, demanding that all religions bless gay marriages.

Homer Simpson Gay Marriage

He cites examples of European state churches compelling their ministers to bless homosexual unions. It’s tempting to imagine that cannot happen here, since we have the constitutional freedom separating church from state. Yet anyone who has followed the Obama administration’s abortion-pill mandate knows full well that this freedom is eroding more rapidly than was thought possible. This will only increase once homosexual “marriage” is declared a constitutional right.

Where gay marriage exists, religious freedom gradually disappears, to the point where ministers have to choose between serving as secularism’s stooges or facing societal oblivion.

In America, this pressure will take the form of “discriminatory” churches losing government grants, permits, and participation in programs. It will be the death of religious freedom by a thousand little cuts here and there: canceled speeches of religious figures at state universities, lost HHS grants, the refusal of city governments to recognize churches that don’t permit gay marriages, “hate crime” legislation that extends to opposition to gay marriage, and so on. All of this will have the effect of pressuring churches into blessing gay marriages. A law forcing priests and ministers to preside at gay marriages won’t need to be passed; the invisible law of indirect governmental pressure will do the trick.

Such a future is perhaps very near, and receding behind the walls of our churches will not prevent it. In short, the homosexual “marriage” question and the HHS abortion-pill mandate are both about something larger: religious freedom.

The untold story of the Philadelphia Massacre

Posted on April 5th, 2013

David Freddoso of the Washington Examiner wonders why major news outlets—always in a rush to cover the sordid, the gruesome, the sensational—have declared a blackout on one of the most sensational court cases we’ve seen in some time.

You might not know it, but there’s a mass murder trial going on in Philadelphia. There has been plenty of courtroom drama, and the death penalty remains a possibility.

The media are seldom shy about such sensational affairs, but they have been with one. Perhaps it’s because the accused mass murderer is an abortion doctor, who along with his medically untrained staff is accused of killing a female patient and several babies who had already been born, alive and breathing.

Gosnell’s preferred method of murder was severing the spinal cords of the children in his “house of horrors.”

Gosnell’s case has not been mentioned even once on any of the three major networks in the last month (his trial began March 18).

It has received only seven mentions on cable television since it began, one on CNN and six on Fox News. In print, Gosnell’s case has been largely ignored outside of local media outlets in Pennsylvania and Delaware.

Freddoso compares that blackout to the wall-to-wall coverage of Sandy Hook, and the manipulation of the public through mass hysteria to quickly demand greater restrictions on firearms. (You should read his entire piece, found here.) Shouldn’t we be having a similar national conversation regarding restrictions on the unsanitary, unsafe, unethical practices in America’s abortion chambers?

Severed feet of babies killed by Gosnell

Gosnell kept severed feet of babies he killed